Direct Costs Explained: Practical Tips for Grant Managers
Managing federal grants requires more than just strong program delivery it demands a precise understanding of how costs are classified. Among the most important distinctions is whether an expense counts as a direct cost or an indirect cost. This classification directly affects compliance, budgeting, and ultimately, the success of your award.
In this article, we’ll break down 2 CFR 200.413 (Direct Costs), explore common scenarios, and share practical tips to help your organization stay compliant while making the most of its funding.
What Are Direct Costs?
At its core, a direct cost is any expense that can be clearly identified with a specific grant, project, or activity. These costs are directly tied to achieving the objectives of the award and can be assigned with a high degree of accuracy.
For example:
Purchasing medical supplies for a federally funded community health clinic = direct cost.
Buying the same supplies for general office use across multiple projects = indirect cost, because it benefits more than one program.
The key takeaway: direct costs are directly and specifically connected to the grant-funded activity.
Direct vs. Indirect Costs: Why Consistency Matters
While the definitions seem straightforward, things can get tricky in practice. Not every expense is universally “direct” or “indirect.” It often depends on the purpose and circumstances.
For instance, technology upgrades are typically considered indirect because they support the whole organization. But if the expense is specifically and exclusively tied to one federal grant — say, a cybersecurity system required for a research project — then it may be charged as a direct cost.
This is why consistency is critical. Organizations must treat similar costs the same way across federal and non-federal funding. Inconsistent classification could trigger audit findings or, worse, repayment of funds.
The Three-Question Test
When deciding if something is a direct cost, ask yourself:
Was this expense specifically incurred for this award?
Does it clearly tie to the award’s goals and objectives?
Can it be easily and accurately traced to the award?
If you answer “yes” to all three, you are most likely looking at a direct cost.
Common examples include:
Personnel salaries and fringe benefits
Supplies and materials
Equipment purchases
Travel required for project execution
Administrative and Clerical Costs
One of the most misunderstood areas is administrative and clerical salaries. By default, these are considered indirect costs. However, 2 CFR 200.413(c) provides conditions under which they may be charged directly:
The services must be integral to the project or activity.
The individuals must be specifically identifiable with the project.
The costs must not also be included in the indirect cost pool (no “double-dipping”).
For instance, if a grant funds a specialized research project requiring a dedicated data entry clerk, and that person works exclusively on the project, their salary can be charged as a direct cost.
Minor Items and Practicality
Federal regulations also recognize practicality. According to 2 CFR 200.413(d), small or “minor” costs may be treated as indirect if doing so is more efficient — provided the organization applies this rule consistently across all funding sources.
What qualifies as “minor” isn’t strictly defined; it depends on your organization’s policies.
Unallowable Costs and Indirect Rates
Another area to watch is unallowable costs. Certain expenses (e.g., lobbying or alcohol) can never be charged to a grant. But when calculating your indirect cost rate, these costs must still be included in the direct cost base to ensure an equitable allocation of overhead.
This prevents organizations from understating their base and artificially inflating their indirect cost rate.
Nonprofits and Special Activities
For nonprofits, certain member-related or client service activities must always be treated as direct costs, even if they are unallowable for federal reimbursement. Examples include:
Membership maintenance and publications
Public relations and conferences
Administration of group benefits like retirement plans
The principle is the same: these activities are significant to the mission, so they must bear their fair share of indirect costs.
Practical Tips for Grant Managers
To navigate direct costs effectively, here are three best practices:
Document everything. Clearly show how each expense relates to the grant and why it is essential.
Train your staff. Everyone involved in budgeting and expense tracking should understand your organization’s cost classification policies.
Stay consistent. Treat similar costs the same way across all programs whether federally funded or not.
Why Getting It Right Matters
Classifying costs correctly isn’t just a technical requirement. It’s about fairness — ensuring that federal funders, your organization, and other partners each pay their fair share.
Getting it wrong can mean audit findings, penalties, or even repayment of funds. Getting it right, however, protects your credibility and strengthens your chances of securing future funding.
Final Thoughts
Understanding 2 CFR 200.413 (Direct Costs) is essential for anyone managing federal grants. By applying the rules consistently, documenting your decisions, and training your team, you can ensure compliance while maximizing resources for your mission.
Direct costs may seem like a small piece of the puzzle, but in reality, they are the foundation of strong financial stewardship in grants management.
Listen to the Grants Management Experts podcast here.
